Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

AOC Follows Pelosi, Trump’s Lead By Voting Big Bucks For Military

Last Thursday, the House of Representatives passed legislation that will, once signed into law, set one of the highest caps ever on the discretionary budget for the Pentagon and related programs. The Democratic Party that now controls the House voted by a vast majority in favor of the bill, and, remarkably, so did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib.

Sonja Krieger

July 31, 2019
Facebook Twitter Share
Pelosi and AOC after a meeting on July 26. “We had a very positive conversation about our districts and how we represent our country and how we need to meet the needs, the diversity of America and the challenges we face in terms of issues and how immigration and people are respected," Pelosi said.

In recent news, we learn that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined 218 other Democrats to approve a budget bill that includes a record amount of military spending for the next two years. Given that AOC has become a symbol of the opposition to Trump and his administration, this surely comes as a surprise. Rashida Tlaib, another outspoken leftist and member of the Democratic Socialists of America, also voted for the bill. 

At first glance, the entire scenario is a bit of a head scratcher. Approved on July 25, with a vote of 284-149 in the House of Representatives, the “Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019” passed with the overwhelming support of House Democrats, only 16 of whom voted against the bill. The Republican side was mostly opposed (with 132 no votes and 65 yes votes). This in spite of the fact that in the lead-up to the vote President Trump urged his party to back the measure, tweeting: “House Republicans should support the TWO YEAR BUDGET AGREEMENT which greatly helps our Military and our Vets. I am totally with you.” 

One might wonder, if the majority of Republicans were not compelled by their party leader’s cajoling (primarily citing, of course, their rejection of any further increase of the debt), why did the Democrats vote almost unanimously for this bill? The answer is simple: Because it was a deal brokered by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House and quintessential representative of the Democratic Party establishment. In collaboration with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Pelosi took charge of the project and successfully rallied her troops around it, including some of the most progressive party members. 

In an effort to avoid automatic budget cuts (sequestration) and another government shutdown, Pelosi managed an agreement that, in her own words, meets the needs of Americans by “investing in middle class priorities that advance the health, financial security and well-being of the American people and enhancing our national security” and by “safeguarding the full faith and credit of the United States of America by achieving a lifting of the debt limit until July 31, 2021.” What’s not to love? 

The $2.7 trillion budget includes more money for domestic spending as well as more money for the military, increasing defense and non-defense expenses by $22 and $27 billion, or 3 and 4% hikes, respectively, for fiscal year 2020. And like any good compromise between the two capitalist parties, this act presents a further expansion of the military as being in the interest of the people. Except in this case, the increase in the already massive military budget did not even require the full backing of the party that is traditionally more interested in national security; the Democrats did the job almost all on their own.

Ultimately, this bill allows both parties to avoid another government shutdown (and thus potentially political unrest) before and during the 2020 elections. While many Republicans polemicize all day long about the deficit, they too will benefit from the suspension of the debt ceiling and thereby averting the prospect of another government funding impasse in the middle of trying to hold on to the White House and battling the Democrats over congressional seats. 

Cynics will perhaps argue that AOC has to start being more of a “team player.” Judging from her recent photo ops with Pelosi, the appearance of unity is important, and AOC is playing along quite nicely. If those images of reconciliation are any indication, AOC and the rest of the “Squad” may soon temper their leftism in order not to be seen as too divisive. Regardless of Pelosi’s attacks on her and their differences on immigration, impeachment, etc., AOC will be expected to swear allegiance to the party establishment. After all, her team is the Democratic Party.

That said, AOC could have easily done what her fellow “Squad” members Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley did by voting no. She could have very easily added her name to the few Democrats who refused to give in to Pelosi’s pressure. To her considerable credit, Omar made a statement, in which she explained her rejection of the bill:

I cannot in good conscience support a bill that continues to throw billions of dollars at endless wars and Pentagon contractors. In order to pursue peace and prosperity at home, we must not continue to destabilize entire countries, fuel migration crises, and put American troops at risk.

We must reduce Pentagon waste and reinvest that money into healthcare, education, housing, jobs, clean energy and infrastructure.

All of this is perfectly correct and consistent with Omar’s record of speaking out strongly against U.S. imperialism. However, there is an obvious contradiction here, which is that her own party has historically been a pillar of the very imperialist system she is criticizing. 

It is also noteworthy that neither AOC nor Rashida Tlaib, who also voted yes, offered a public statement. But then again, it is difficult to see how they could reasonably justify having supported a resolution that allots almost $1.5 trillion to the Pentagon and only $1.3 trillion to the entire rest of the government. Is this disappointing? That depends on one’s expectations and hopes regarding the group of newly elected “socialists” in Congress and regarding the Democrats in general. However, even AOC’s fans, especially in the DSA, would do well to stop and think about just what it means when one of the most left politicians in the Democratic Party has no problems signing on to a measure that directly contributes to the perpetuation and exacerbation of U.S. imperialism in the world. 

Thanks to this legislation, half of the country’s discretionary funds will once again be spent on defense. It is useful to remember that this amount is almost enough to completely eliminate poverty in the U.S., which has been estimated to cost 1.7 trillion. Also thanks to this legislation, the U.S. will further boost an apparatus that contributes more than anything else to the devastation of the global environment with its raw material consumption and its pollution and destruction of the natural world.

The Senate is expected to debate the bill in the coming days and pass it. President Trump is planning to sign it into law. It’s business as usual, and we can safely count on progressive Democrats to work with their Republican colleagues, or to even do their jobs for them, “in the service of the American people.” Nancy Pelosi is clearly able to get her party in line when it comes to guaranteeing the continued smooth operation of the capitalist state. 

“Democratic socialists” like AOC can make a lot of noise when they want to but have demonstrated on several occasions that they will fold under the pressure to comply with their party’s demands. Her and Tlaib’s yes votes illustrate that their opposition to Trump’s policies, while often brave and sharp, is inevitably subject to being reigned in by their own political party. Of course, turning a blind eye to U.S. militarism and imperialist domination is necessary to work within the Democratic Party, which is one of the reasons why imagining that the Democrats as the lesser of two evils can affect substantial social change reveals itself once again as a pipe dream. 

Facebook Twitter Share

Sonja Krieger

Sonja has been an editor and writer for Left Voice since 2016. She teaches college students and is an active AFT member.

United States

President Biden greets John Fetterman, Pennsylvania’s Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, after arriving Thursday at Pittsburgh International Airport

Jacobin Is Wrong: The Midterms Were Not a Socialist Wave

The 2022 midterms were not a “red wave” of socialism — we don’t win by shoehorning capitalist politicians into a leftist mold.

Otto Fors

November 20, 2022

A Weakened Trump Poses as an Alternative for the Working Class in Third Bid for President

Speaking at Mar-a-Lago a week after the failed “red wave” of the midterms, Trump made an appeal to all those spurned by neoliberalism and feeling the effects of inflation to rally behind his xenophobic, transphobic, and pro-capitalist agenda.

Madeleine Freeman

November 16, 2022
People rallying for abortion rights march down Congress Avenue in Austin on May 3, 2022

Abortion Protected the Democrats, but the Democrats Won’t Protect Abortion

The midterms showed that people care deeply about reproductive rights. The Democrats successfully positioned themselves as the defenders of abortion, but refuse to protect it.

Molly Rosenzweig

November 15, 2022
U.S. President Joe Biden on Wednesday addresses a news conference at the White following the midterm election in which his Democratic Party fared better than expected

Midterm Elections in the United States: The Republican Tide That Wasn’t

The Republican “red wave” did not materialize, but last Tuesday’s results will leave two years of divided government in the United States.

Claudia Cinatti

November 14, 2022

MOST RECENT

Education Workers Have the Power to Win in Toronto

A rank-and-file educational worker who participated in the historic strike earlier this month in Toronto discusses how fellow workers can fight back against the Doug Ford administration and win their demands.

Martin Reilly

November 20, 2022

Under Xiomara Castro’s Government, the Garífunas in Honduras Still Await Answers in the Struggle for Their Land

The Garífunas in Honduras persist in their struggle for their ancestral lands, while eviction attempts and threats against their leaders continue. Almost 10 months into Xiomara Castro’s administration, her campaign promises to the Garífuna communities remain unfulfilled.

Marisela Trevin

November 19, 2022

New School Adjuncts Strike for Higher Wages Amid Ongoing Labor Struggles Across the US

1,300 adjuncts at the new school in NYC are on strike. This strike comes in the midst of other strikes across the country including at The University of California and Starbucks.

Jean Faber

November 18, 2022

Historic Strike at The University of California Could Reshape the Terrain of Labor Struggles in Higher Education

Forty-eight thousand workers are on strike at the University of California — the largest higher-education strike in U.S. history. These young workers are demanding raises that allow them to afford rent and childcare in some of the most expensive locations in the country. A successful strike of this magnitude could fundamentally change the terrain of labor struggle in higher education, which has systematically exploited its most vulnerable workers.

Carolina Flores

November 18, 2022