Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Sanders Votes for Increased Border Security Despite Progressive Opposition

Bernie Sanders was notably one of the only progressives in Congress to vote in favor of the recent spending bill to keep the government open. In doing so, he failed to fight in the interest of both immigrant and federal workers.

Madeleine Freeman

February 20, 2019
Facebook Twitter Share

Last Thursday, February 14, Democrats and Republicans in Congress agreed on a bill for government funding which includes $1.375 billion for border fencing in Texas and additional funding for new border patrol agents and border security technology. The bill passed the Senate 83-16 and the House 300-128, with widespread support from Democrats and Republicans alike.

Of the 128 votes against the bill, only 16 came from Democrats, among them newcomers Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. Nearly all of the Democratic hopefuls for the 2020 election—some of whom have, until recently, voted conservatively when it comes to immigration, like Kirsten Gillibrand—voted against the bill as well, presumably to distance themselves from the xenophobic policies of Donald Trump as each prepares to make a bid for the White House in the next election.

This resistance to the funding bill makes it all the more remarkable that Bernie Sanders, considered by many to be a stalwart of the anti-establishment left in Congress and a candidate for the presidency himself, voted in favor of the spending agreement—a bill which legitimizes Trump’s racist fear-mongering about the “crisis” at the border. While numerous politicians considerably to the right of Sanders voted against the bill, such as Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, Sanders sided with the vast majority of establishment Democrats in the Senate who chose to pass the bill.

You might be interested in: A Socialist Case Against Bernie 2020

Sanders explained his decision on the night of the vote, tweeting : “While I have concerns about this bill, I supported it because I can’t turn my back on the 2 million federal employees and private contractors who would be forced again to work without pay. I am also concerned about the millions who would be denied access to government services.” In other words, for Sanders, voting for the bill was the best way to avoid another shutdown, the consequences of which outweigh those of an expansion of the resources of the United States’ immigration system.

Sanders says that voting against the deal in order to avert another shutdown would be a betrayal of working people in the United States. But what about turning his back on the thousands of working people and families who are waiting for asylum at the border or those who risk being killed by border patrol officers as they try to cross into the U.S.? What about turning his back on immigrants already in the United States who will continue to be arrested and forced into detention centers under abominable conditions as they wait for their cases to be processed?

The way that Sanders articulates the problem of the spending bill pits workers’ interests against each other, as if opposing an agreement which endangers the lives of workers and families trying to cross into the U.S. amounts to abandoning workers already living in the U.S. It says that the choice is between either protecting immigrant workers and families or protecting federal workers in the United States.

This is a false dichotomy. The interests of workers in one country are inextricably intertwined with the interests of all workers around the world. The threat that a funding bill which allocates resources to border security poses to the lives and livelihoods of people coming to the United States to work and provide for their families is inseparable from the condition of American workers threatened by the prospect of work without pay and no access to government services. Both are subject to the whims of the ruling class and both suffer as a result of increased border security measures provided by this new bill. It serves only the interests of capitalists to advance xenophobic policies that fund fences and walls, separating and endangering working people and families. Voting in favor of the bill goes against the interests of both workers coming into the United States and those already living there, perpetuating a narrow, nationalistic conception of the working class.

Furthermore, this funding bill is not in even the immediate interest of the two million workers Sanders is trying to protect. The bill allocates no money for the backpay of the thousands of low-wage federal workers who missed a month’s paycheck during the shutdown. It provides no guarantee that Trump will not shut down the government and put pressure on federal workers as the fight over the border wall continues. It certainly did not prevent Trump from declaring a state of emergency which he hopes will divert $8 billion in government funds to the wall, a move which will hardly improve the lives of workers in the United States.

Sanders voted in favor of the bill in order to prevent another shutdown, but yielding to the racist policies of the Trump administration is not the way to ensure that federal workers are paid or to protect the interests of the working class. We must call on workers to provide their own solution to the prospect of a shutdown, one that does not involve turning their backs on immigrant workers and families. Only independent mobilizations which fight as hard against xenophobic immigration policies as they they do against shutdowns will show Trump and all of Washington that workers will not tolerate these latest attacks on their interests.

Facebook Twitter Share

Madeleine Freeman

Madeleine is a writer and video collaborator for Left Voice. She lives in New York.

United States

Police office crouches behind a riot shield which reads "Shelby Township Police"

BLM Leader In Court to Challenge Racist and Retaliatory Charges

A Detroit leader of the Black Lives Matter movement is set to appear in court to challenge racist and retaliatory felony charges for marching to demand the firing of a Chief of Police who called BLM protestors “subhuman” and said they belonged in “body bags”.

Somali troops stand in formation during a graduation ceremony after being trained by U.S. forces in Mogadishu on Aug. 17, 2018.

Biden Is Expanding U.S. Military Intervention in Somalia

President Biden recently approved an order to send hundreds of troops to Somalia. This move serves the interests of U.S. imperialism by taking advantage of the very political instability it helped create.

Sam Carliner

May 20, 2022
Semi-empty store shelf with a few cans of baby formula.

The Baby Formula Shortage Is a Capitalist Crisis of Social Reproduction

The baby formula shortage is a consequence of capitalism and a crisis of social reproduction. Formula should not be commodified and sold — it should be free and a basic right for all parents.

In the Latest Primaries, the Battle within the Parties Continues

Tuesday's primaries delivered wins to Trump endorsed candidates and some progressives, signaling that the fight for the parties is far from over.

Ezra Brain

May 18, 2022


The Kids Are Alright: Meet the 17 Year Olds That Want to Unionize Starbucks

They haven't finished high school yet, but they are already fighting to organize the first union at Starbucks in the San Francisco Bay Area. Driven by the unionization wave sweeping the country, two 17-year-olds are organizing with their coworkers through a chat called "Union Babes" and fighting the company's union-busting campaigns.

People protest in support of the unionizing efforts of the Alabama Amazon workers, in Los Angeles, California, March 22, 2021.

Amazon Won’t Stop Union Busting and Firing Organizers

Amazon hasn't recognized the Amazon Labor Union and, like Starbucks, is continuing to union bust and fire organizers.

Luigi Morris

May 20, 2022
A protester waves a sign that read "unionize" near the Country Club Plaza Starbucks store where dozens of Starbucks employees and union supporters protested alleged anti-union tactics by the company Thursday, March 3, 2022.

El Paso Starbucks Workers Are Organizing in the Face of Relentless Union Busting

Starbucks’s preemptive union-busting tactics in El Paso, Texas, have backfired and inspired workers at the Fountains to unionize.

Paul Ginestá

May 20, 2022
SEIU local 721 members at a rally wearing purple and holding signs for fair wage increases.

SEIU 721, Vote No! A Better Contract Is Possible

Union leaders of SEIU 721 have reached a deal with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. But there are big problems with the proposed agreement, and the rank and file should vote against it.

Left Voice

May 20, 2022