Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Trump’s Travel Ban: As American as Apple Pie

While Democrats argue that the migrant ban is un-American, they ignore America’s long history of xenophobic policies.

Tatiana Cozzarelli

January 30, 2017
Facebook Twitter Share

Yesterday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) gave a press conference in which he spoke out against Trump’s executive order blocking the entry of people from seven Muslim-majority countries. With tears in his eyes, he said, “This executive order was mean-spirited and un-American.” Of course, Schumer did not mention that the list of countries was first created by a bipartisan visa restriction program, the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act. This act was passed in a bipartisan manner in Congress and approved by Obama in 2015. Schumer also neglected to mention that these are the countries that the Obama administration attacked at a rate of three bombs per hour in 2016

In his public statement, Schumer suggested that a bipartisan group of legislators should formulate an immigration plan to counter Trump’s reactionary order. He went on, “Tears are running down the cheeks of the Statue of Liberty tonight as a grand tradition of America, welcoming immigrants, that has existed since America was founded, has been stomped upon.”

While he argues that Trump’s actions are counter to US traditions, this is completely untrue; the US government has always had anti-immigrant elements and policies. The following four examples illustrate this characteristic:

The Alien and Sedition Act

The Alien and Sedition Act was signed into law by John Adams, the second president of the United States, in 1798. The law increased residency requirements for citizenship from five to fourteen years. It also made it impossible for people from “enemy nations” to ever become US citizens. Immigrants were subject to deportation if they were considered “dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States.”

The fact that the second president of the United States signed an anti-immigrant policy into law reveals the length of the historical precedent being followed.

The Chinese Exclusion Act

The Chinese Exclusion Act was passed in 1882 and kept on the books in various forms for over 100 years. The act barred Chinese laborers from entering the US and denied citizenship for any Chinese residents already living in the country. In 1943, Chinese people were given the right to naturalization and some Chinese were allowed to immigrate — though this number was capped at 105 per year. In 1968, these limits became more lax with an annual maximum of 20,000 people being able to enter from any single country outside the Western Hemisphere.

The explicitly racist Chinese Exclusion Act is a clear example of the way that xenophobia and geopolitics have shaped US policy.


Japanese Internment Camps

Japanese internment camps also demonstrate the racism and xenophobia pervasive throughout US history. During World War II, from 110,000 to 120,000 people of Japanese descent were rounded up and forced into internment camps simply for their ancestry and regardless of their citizenship. The racist notion that Japanese people were national enemies and potential terroristsis echoed today in the chauvinistic, anti-Muslim policies and discourse of the Trump Administration.

The Patriot Act

The Patriot Act of 2001, signed by George W. Bush, and its renewal, signed by Barack Obama, laid the groundwork for Trump’s ban on Muslim immigrants. After the 9/11 attacks, the Patriot Act was passed, expanding the government’s power to search and investigate people and businesses without a warrant. It also made way for the long-term detention of immigrants suspected of “terrorism,” resulting in the nationwide targeting and surveillance of Muslims by the US government.

Xenophobic Policies are Deeply American

This lie that anti-immigration policy is somehow a new introduction to American tradition is perpetuated by the Democratic party in a way that is entirely functional to their message: to demonize the Republican Party and arguing that only the Democrats can maintain America’s “greatness.” This is designed to discourage the public from questioning the racist and xenophobic core of American history, placing the blame entirely on Republicans for this xenophobic and racist “moment.” This falsification masks the Democrats’ role in the formation of a reactionary history.

The idea of the US as a nation open to all immigrants is a false one, contradicted by the history of the nation. The Statue of Liberty is inscribed with words that have been discarded by history. Schumer’s words drip with the hypocrisy of someone whose party approved of the continuous bombing of the region that contains the seven countries whose citizens are currently banned from entering the United States, deported more immigrants than any other, and opened the door for the attacks by the Trump administration.

Facebook Twitter Share

Tatiana Cozzarelli

Tatiana is a former middle school teacher and current Urban Education PhD student at CUNY.

United States

The Deadliest Year for U.S.-Mexico Border Crossings Occurred during Biden’s Administration

The humanitarian crisis at the border was created by capitalism. Voting for a lesser evil won’t save the Latin American working class; it will take international, political and strategic solidarity across borders to build a combative immigrants’ rights movement.

Paul Ginestá

September 28, 2023

Scabs Will Not Pass: Defend the UAW Strike With Organized Grassroots Power

The Big Three are escalating their use of scabs. The rank and file are fighting back.

Jason Koslowski

September 27, 2023
NYC Mayor Eric Adams stands at a podium.

The Housing Crisis and Migrant Crisis Are Crises of Capitalism

As thousands of people come to the U.S. seeking shelter, politicians around the country are claiming that housing in the U.S. is already in crisis and that there is no room for them. Both the “migrant crisis” and “housing crisis” are crises created and exacerbated by capitalism.

Mike Pappas

September 20, 2023

To Win, the UAW Strike Must Be Organized from Below

The strike at the Big Three has put the working class at the center of national politics. The autoworkers’ demands are bold and touch on issues of growing exploitation across the country. To win big, the strike must be organized from below.

Tristan Taylor

September 18, 2023


The Big Three Are Using Layoffs to Punish the UAW and Undermine the Strike

The Big Three are retaliating against the UAW by laying off thousands of its members at plants across the country. Defeating these attacks will require the self organization and mobilization of all the workers.

James Dennis Hoff

September 28, 2023
President Biden visits striking UAW workers in Michigan.

Biden’s Picket Line Visit Doesn’t Mean He Is On Our Side

President Biden’s visit to the UAW picket line shows the strength of the strike — and why it should remain independent from him and the Democrats.

Tatiana Cozzarelli

September 27, 2023

Toward a Revolutionary Socialist Network

In this article Warren Montag and Joseph Serrano respond to our call for a network for a working-class party for socialism. 

Warren Montag

September 27, 2023

China’s Rise, ‘Diminished Dependency,’ and Imperialism in Times of World Disorder

In this broad-ranging interview, originally published in LINKS, Trotskyist Fraction member Esteban Mercatante discusses how recent global shifts in processes of capital accumulation have contributed to China’s rise, the new (and old) mechanisms big powers use to plunder the Global South, and its implications for anti-imperialist and working-class struggles today.

Esteban Mercatante

September 22, 2023