Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

U.S. Submarine Deal with Australia Another Provocative Step Against China

The U.S. has agreed to export nuclear submarines to Australia. The move is a huge blow to France, which will lose a huge contract signed in 2016, and is a yet another provocative step against China.

Juan Chingo

September 17, 2021
Facebook Twitter Share
A submarine in a harbor, soldiers in the background.

The Australian government announced yesterday that it had signed an agreement with the United States and the United Kingdom for the production of nuclear-powered submarines. The move annuls a previous $90 billion agreement that Australia made with France for the procurement of diesel and electric submarines. The latter contract, signed with French defense contractor Naval Group in 2016, had been hailed as the “contract of the century.” Paris reacted strongly, calling the move “deplorable,” with French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian going as far as to draw comparisons between the Biden administration’s sudden decision and Donald Trump’s rash, unilateral decision-making style. Beijing, for its part, condemned the countries’ “cold war and zero-sum mentality.”

Maritime Siege against China

Beyond disagreement between France and Australia over production sites, the decision shows the Biden administration’s preference for providing Canberra with non-conventional submarines — which France could not guarantee — capable of making the Oceanic country a pillar of the United States’ Chinese containment policy. The submarines can remain submerged for a long time, avoiding detection, and have the potential to fire long-range cruise missiles such as the Tomahawk in addition to their maritime armament of torpedoes and marine missiles. Defense specialist Jean-Dominique Merchet notes that this is the first time that the U.S. has agreed to sell such game-changing naval technology, and that previously only the U.K., in 1958, had benefited from the transfer of this U.S. technology. 

The submarine production process will begin in 2040, despite the fact that Australia does not have the necessary facilities to produce the specific fuel the submarines require, and that it would to some extent violate the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Wednesday’s deal increases the already high pressure on China considerably in any conflict scenario along the main maritime choke points in South and Southeast Asia (for example, in the Strait of Malacca, the Taiwan Strait, or the South and East China Seas).

At the same time, the timing of this announcement — two weeks after the catastrophic military withdrawal from Afghanistan — allows Washington to confirm its geopolitical priority: maintaining rivalry with Beijing and reassuring its allies in this important region. As part of this, on September 24, Biden will receive the three co-leaders of the so-called Quad, the security alliance to contain Chinese influence: the prime ministers of Australia, India, and Japan in person at the White House for the first time.

Heavy Blow to France’s Image and Unbridled Imperialism 

The agreement is a heavy blow to French diplomacy, not so much because of the economic damage — which is not negligible — but because of the loss of credibility. For years, France has been positioning itself as a permanent power in the Indo-Pacific, linked to the colonial possessions of its overseas territories. The country has sought to present itself as a third option outside of the U.S. and China in the region’s seas, refusing to be confined by the United States’ anti-Chinese naval containment.

Irritated at the loss of a lucrative contract, the French government has brought out its anti-Americanism as a mask. For supporters of Emmanuel Macron, the submarine deal demonstrates the French president’s strategic acumen in invoking Europe’s (impossible) strategic autonomy. But the reality is that beyond its imperial pretensions (which are far larger than its real strength), France needs the Pentagon — whether at the level of intelligence, military presence, or weapons — in the wars it’s waging, whether in the Sahel or North Africa. This is not to even mention the other European powers whose militaries pale in comparison to Paris.

The reality is that despite the Biden administration’s kind words towards European allies, these truly are Trump-like unilateral decisions. The United States has confirmed, once again, that its priority is rivalry with China at all levels — economic, technological, and military. Washington has no problem privileging its most important allies in this confrontation over traditional European allies, who are more moderate vis-à-vis Beijing and seeking points of “mutual understanding.” The new U.S. administration recently showed its first signs of this treatment when Switzerland decided to purchase F-35s from the U.S. over France’s Rafale aircrafts just after Biden’s visit to the Swiss Confederation at the end of June.

Notably, neither the French government nor the EU foreign affairs official were informed of the new agreement prior to its announcement. And even more shamefully, the agreement came one day before the EU launched its own new Indo-Pacific strategy to comfort the United States, a sign that the EU still has a long way to go before it acquires true strategic autonomy.

Originally published in Spanish on September 16 in La Izquierda Diario

Translated by Otto Fors

Facebook Twitter Share

Juan Chingo

Juan is an editor of our French sister site Révolution Permanente.

Twitter

Asia-Pacific

The Roots of the Rebellion at Foxconn

Jenny Chan is a researcher and professor at the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong. She is co-author of the book Dying for an iPhone. She spoke with La Izquerda Diario about the causes of the rebellion by workers at the Foxconn plant in Zhengzhou, China.

Josefina L. Martínez

December 7, 2022
Participants in a memorial ceremony lay flowers to pay respect to a deceased 23-year-old worker in front of the SPC headquarters in Seoul, Thursday. She died in an accident at a baking factory in Pyeongtaek affiliated with SPC on Saturday.

How Workers and Socialists are Responding to a Workplace Death at One of South Korea’s Largest Food Manufacturers

Following a workplace death at SPC group, one of the largest food manufacturers in South Korea, a consumer boycott quickly gained traction. Organized workers and revolutionary socialists are playing a role in this struggle.

Sam Carliner

November 12, 2022
A man holds a Sri Lankan national flag during a protest outside the Parliament complex in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Protests Against Inflation and the IMF Return to Sri Lanka

Protesters, along with unions and political organizations took to the streets of Sri Lanka on Thursday, mobilizing against inflation, staggering food prices, and new IMF adjustment programs ushered in by the the illegitimate government of Wickremesinghe, which replaced Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government by mass demonstrations in July.

What’s behind the Escalations in Korea?

For the first time in five years, tensions in the Korean peninsula are escalating. This comes in the context of a U.S. military buildup in the Pacific, driven by greater capitalist competition between the United States and China.

Sam Carliner

October 7, 2022

MOST RECENT

South African president Cyril Ramaphosa in a suit

“Farmgate” Threatens the Very Foundations of Capitalist Stability in South Africa

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa faces an impeachment vote Tuesday. More than a simple case of corruption, it’s a political crisis of the ruling party and of capitalist stability in the country.

Sam Carliner

December 5, 2022

Understanding the Carnage at Colorado Springs

The heinous violence displayed in Colorado Springs is a stark reminder of the menacing, lethal threat that today’s determined far right continues to pose to trans and queer people, and anyone living outside capitalism’s imposed sexual and gender boundaries.

Keegan O'Brien

December 4, 2022
Mapuche people standing with a flag

The Case of the Mapuche: What Can Trotsky Teach Us about the Fight against National Oppression?

Trotsky’s reflections on the social aspect of permanent revolution have deep implications for building working-class hegemony through solidarity with oppressed peoples.

Juan Valenzuela

December 4, 2022

“We Sold Out the People Who Elected Us”: UC Bargaining Team Member Speaks Out About Union Concessions

Here we publish the testimony of a graduate student worker on strike at the University of California, who is part of the bargaining team for UAW Local 2865. Wednesday night, the bargaining team voted 10-9 to make severe concessions to the university.