Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Why Is the City Still Protecting the Cops Who Murdered Breonna Taylor?

Breonna Taylor was murdered by three police in her own apartment. The announcement that one of them will be fired shows authorities feel some pressure from the tens of thousands of people demanding justice. But none of them have been arrested for the murder they committed. 

Daniel Nath

June 27, 2020
Facebook Twitter Share
Vigil for Breonna Taylor, in Louisville, Kentucky, on March 19. Photo: Sam Upshaw Jr.

On June 19, three months after Louisville, Kentucky police murdered Breonna Taylor in her own home, the city finally announced it is taking initial steps to fire one of the three police who sprayed her apartment with bullets. 

Taylor was a 26-year-old Black emergency room technician. Just after midnight on March 13, the Louisville Metro Police Department obtained a “no knock warrant” to immediately raid and search her apartment. At least five cops participated. They came in plainclothes while Taylor and her boyfriend Kenneth Walker were in bed, and they used a battering ram to break down the door. The police insist that they knocked and identified themselves in spite of getting a no knock warrant, but Walker and multiple neighbors testify they did not.

When the police burst in, Taylor and Walker believed they were being burglarized, and Walker fired one shot with his licensed handgun in self-defense, hitting one cop in the thigh. During the incident, he called 911 and said, “Somebody kicked in the door and shot my girlfriend.” After Walker fired one shot, three of the cops fired more than 20 bullets into the apartment. They hit six different rooms of Taylor’s home, and bullets passed into the neighboring apartment where a mother and her five-year-old child were at home. The police hit Taylor with eight bullets, and she died— a clear police murder of a woman who was sleeping in her own home.

After months of increasing public outrage, the new Police Chief Rob Schroeder and Mayor Greg Fischer finally presented Officer Brett Hankison with a letter of intent to fire him from the LMPD. Hankison had fired 10 rounds. The LMPD admits that he shot “wantonly and blindly” through a covered patio door and a window with no view of whom he was shooting at. On June 11, the city council passed what it called Breonna’s Law — an ordinance banning future no knock warrants and requiring police to wear body cameras when carrying out warrants, which the narcotics squad that killed Taylor did not do.

Firing Hanikson is not Enough

Authorities have chosen to do the minimum possible in response to Taylor’s murder, hoping to pacify some critics and move on with few real consequences. The decision to fire Hankison raises many sharp questions:

  1. Why is Officer Brett Hankison not charged with murder, and why are the other two cops who sprayed Taylor’s apartment with bullets neither charged nor fired?
  2. The day Taylor was killed, then-Chief Steve Conrad (removed over the subsequent killing of Black restaurant owner David McAtee during protests) told the media the LMPD did not know whether she had been armed, how many shots were fired at cops, or how many shots the cops fired at Taylor and Walker. Why was the police chief permitted to lie about easily proven facts to cover for officers? Why are there no consequences for these lies? Conrad called both Taylor and Walker suspects even though the police search found nothing illegal in Taylor’s home and the actual “suspect” had already been apprehended at the time police shot her. These lies allowed the police to arrest  Walker and charge him with attempted murder. Prosecutors dropped the fabricated charge only after two months of public mobilizations
  3. The LMPD wrote an Incident/Investigation report on Taylor’s death that is literally blank except for naming the three cops who fired, stating that there was “no bias” motive in the killing, and, written under the Notes/Narratives section merely “PIU [Public Integrity Unit] Investigation.” In a warrant application for the home immediately after the shooting, the LMPD wrote that police had “struck the subject” who fired at them, another lie. Why was the department permitted to give false reports on the shooting that served to cover up police actions?
  4. The three officers who shot into Taylor’s home have been suspended. But they have all continued to receive their paychecks. A city lawyer has ruled that their salaries cannot be cut off without further investigation. This attorney, Annele Taylor, objected to public condemnation of the killer cops. She wrote on June 15, “There is disputable evidence as to whether misconduct occurred.” Why have public officials been allowed to use vague dismissals to cover for this brutal murder?
  5. The decision to fire Hankison is subject to an astonishing review process that allows police to resist firings for brutality. Hankison and his lawyer were allowed to present a defense at a “predetermination meeting” before the police chief, who ruled against him. Now they are allowed to appeal to the so-called “Police Merit Board” of five people appointed by the mayor and two people elected by the police force. The city police union claims this process is “to ensure everyone gets their right to due process.” Shockingly, Brett Hankison himself is one of the two elected cop members of the “Police Merit Board.” He is unlikely to preside at his own appeal, but it is unclear whether he will be replaced with another cop. Hankison has been previously accused of several dozen acts of brutality and misconduct, including sexual assault. The fact that the police force elected such a person as their representative shows that police brutality and racism are not about exceptional “bad apples.” Other openly brutal cops have been elected by their fellow officers in cities including Minneapolis and Chicago. This board has the power to stop a firing and give an alternative penalty. While this process is going on, the police chief and the mayor are legally banned from speaking outside the hearings about the case against a cop. Why is it easier for many workers to be fired for being late to work than for a cop to be fired for murdering a Black woman? Can a mayor seriously say he wants to have accountability and reform for the police and then consent to follow such a nakedly corrupt law designed to shield police from scrutiny?
  6. Protesters have asked why police decided to search Taylor’s apartment at one o’clock in the morning. Even more disturbingly, police got their warrant simply by telling a judge that Taylor allowed her ex-boyfriend Jamarcus Glover to pick up packages mailed for him to her home. Police said Glover was a drug dealer. They said that Taylor was guilty by association for allowing him to get mail at her home. And then they asked for the no knock warrant because, “these drug traffickers” have a history of monitoring for incoming police, destroying evidence and fleeing. Who are “these drug traffickers?” Will anyone believe that police would have been able to get a warrant in this way against a white healthcare worker? Police located Glover to arrest him ten miles away from Taylor’s house shortly before they broke into her home. Despite portraying Glover as a big time drug pusher, they caught him with merely “several ounces of suspected crack cocaine [and] marijuana.” (What is hidden by counting them together?) The operation that led to Taylor’s death poured untold police hours and deadly force into catching an alleged small scale seller of recreational drugs. Meanwhile, police took it on themselves to call Breonna Taylor a drug dealer over some closed packages and then murder her. Did this happen because of one inappropriately aggressive cop, or was the system to blame? Will authorities admit that the police and judges use the War on Drugs as an excuse to target and destroy Black people’s lives?

The explosive nature of the current Black Lives Matter protests have forced prosecutors to press charges when they are too afraid to go about business as usual. Prosecutors in Georgia had to press charges for murder against both the police killers of Rayshard Brooks and the racist vigilantes who killed Ahmaud Arberry while he was jogging. The movement needs to force authorities, specifically Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, who is now in charge of the case, to charge all three of the cops who shot Breonna Taylor with murder.

We have heard politicians and companies say they respect workers for doing vital jobs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Yet the U.S. system did almost nothing to stop the virus as it hit Black and Latino communities several times harder than whites. Bosses everywhere said they were going to treat health care workers as heroes. What about Breonna Taylor? She was both an innocent Black woman and a hospital worker, and officials have been accomplices to the cops who killed her. 

Facebook Twitter Share

Daniel Nath

Daniel is a political writer, lives in the Midwest, and is forklift certified. He has covered topics including police crimes, borders, and why unions can't be apolitical

Guest Posts

Xenophobia on the Rise in Russia  

After the deadly attack on a music hall in Moscow, racism against non-Russian people is growing. This has a long history in Russia. 

Alina Tatarova

April 5, 2024
A group of protesters gather in front of the University of Michigan. Some are holding Palestinian flags

University of Michigan Proposes a Harsh Policy Curtailing Freedom of Speech and Protest on Campus

A new policy proposal targeting activists, protestors, and union organizers is cause for concern, but might help groups engaged in a range of struggles find a common enemy.

Ryan McCarty

March 30, 2024

Lord Balfour Was an Imperialist Warmonger 

We should give our full solidarity to the Palestine Action comrade who defaced a portrait of Arthur Balfour at Cambridge University. But the problem for everyone who opposes the genocide against Gaza is how to massify and politically equip the movement.

Daniel Nath

March 21, 2024

“Poor Things” Floats Like a Butterfly and Stings Like a Butterfly

Poor Things is a fantastical comedy with beautiful set design and costumes and an Oscar-winning performance from Emma Stone. So why did it leave me feeling so empty? Despite juggling feminist and socialist ideas, the film is ideologically muddled and often self-contradictory.

Basil Rozlaban

March 16, 2024


U.S. Imperialism is Pushing Tensions in the Middle East to a Boiling Point

U.S. Imperialism's support for Israel is driving the tensions behind Iran's attack and the escalations in the Middle East. It is all the more urgent for the working class to unite with the movement for Palestine against imperialism and chart a way out of the crisis in the region.

Samuel Karlin

April 15, 2024

Thousands of Police Deployed to Shut Down Congress on Palestine in Berlin

This weekend, a Palestine Congress was supposed to take place in the German capital. But 2,500 police were mobilized and shut down the event before the first speech could be held. Multiple Jewish comrades were arrested.

Nathaniel Flakin

April 12, 2024

Liberal Towns in New Jersey Are Increasing Attacks on Pro-Palestine Activists

A group of neighbors in South Orange and Maplewood have become a reference point for pro-Palestine organizing in New Jersey suburbs. Now these liberal towns are upping repression against the local activists.

Samuel Karlin

April 12, 2024

“We Shouldn’t Let this Stop Us”: Suspended Columbia Student Activist Speaks Out

Aidan Parisi, a student at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, was recently suspended and has been threatened with eviction from their graduate student housing for pro-Palestinian activism on campus. Aidan talked to Left Voice about the state of repression, the movement at Columbia, and the path forward for uniting the student movement with the labor movement and other movements against oppression.

Left Voice

April 11, 2024