Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Anti-Zionism Is Not Antisemitism

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance offers a “working definition” of antisemitism. This definition is “bewilderingly imprecise,” as one expert says. Its purpose is to accuse the Left of antisemitism, as was the case when Trotskyist legislators in Argentina were recently accused of “antisemitism” for refusing to support Israeli apartheid.

Nathaniel Flakin

July 5, 2020
Facebook Twitter Share

What is antisemitism? Despite the complex history of the term, the definition is pretty simple: anti-Jewish racism.

The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) offers a “working definition” that at first glance might seem innocuous:

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

The IHRA is an alliance of 31 (mostly European and mostly imperialist) countries. This definition, as David Feldman, director of the Pears Institute for the Study of Anti-Semitism has put it, is “bewilderingly imprecise.” It might mean hatred — but it might not. It could be directed against Jews — but could also be directed against gentiles. This so-called definition covers everything and nothing.

The 38 words do not mention the state of Israel or Zionism. Yet it is accompanied by eleven examples, explaining that “Contemporary examples of antisemitism (…)  could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to…” Of these eleven examples, seven relate to Israel.

While the “definition” could not be more vague, the “examples” make explicit that any opposition to state of Israel is to be considered antisemitic. The eighth point is: “Applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.”

But what, exactly, constitutes a “double standard”? And who decides? People around the world condemn Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine. But the Israeli government and its supporters will point to other cases of ethnic cleansing, occupation, and mass murder to claim that Israel is being treated unfairly.

Another example of supposed “antisemitism” is: “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.” So anyone who does not support an exclusively Jewish state covering all of Palestine, and anyone who defends the Palestinians’ right self-determination, is explicitly called an antisemite.

Zionism here is presented in the language of a national liberation movement (“self-determination”). But the founders of Zionism were very explicit that theirs was a colonial project, and they initially sought the patronage of the British Empire. London hoped to create a “little loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of hostile Arabism,” in the words of a British governor of Jerusalem. Following the model in Northern Ireland, a settler population would guarantee the interests of imperialism. Israel now fulfills a similar role for the hegemonic imperialist power, the United States. The demand to dismantle the Zionist regime is not about denying self-determination — it is a basic demand of decolonization, no different than the demands to end Apartheid in South Africa (which was, of course, supported by Israel). 

An International Campaign

Supporters of Israel have tried to introduce this definition all around the world, from college campuses to national parliaments, in order to then attack the Left as antisemitic. This is precisely what the Argentine government of Alberto Fernández, in cooperation with the Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu, is attempting. Since the radical Left, represented in parliament by the Workers Left Front — Unity (FIT-U), rejected this definition, they were immediately accused of antisemitism by the Zionist Organization of Argentina.

The definition is so vague as to be meaningless — but that is precisely the point. On this basis, anyone can be credibly accused of antisemitism, and anyone can be shielded from that accusation. As Kenneth Stern, who drafted the original definition, said: “The definition was not drafted, and was never intended, as a tool to target or chill speech on a college campus.”

Donald Trump, for example, has publicly violated the sixth point: “Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.” Speaking to U.S. Jews, Trump referred to the Israeli leader as “your prime minister.” Yet Trump has never been accused by these right-wing forces of antisemitism.

Benjamin Netanyahu continuously violates the eleventh point: “Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.” His government constantly tries to define the state of Israel — whose Jewish citizens make up less than half the Jewish population of the world — as the “nation-state of the Jewish people.” Every crime committed by the Israeli state is presented to the world as the work of “the Jews.” But again, Netanyahu has never been accused of antisemitism.

A Complete Redefinition

We are witnessing a complete redefinition of the term antisemitism. It is now used by right-wing forces like Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil or Viktor Orban of Hungary to attack the Left. These figures combine classical antisemitic tropes — such as their hatred of George Soros as the supposed Jewish puppetmaster of the world — with strong support for the right-wing government of Israel. This might seem like a contradiction.

But evangelical churches, whose doctrine claims that Jews murdered their savior and must all perish in Armageddon in order for the righteous to ascend to heaven, have long been the bedrock of support for Israel in the United States. To give just one example, the preacher John Hagee has said that Hitler had been doing God’s will — Hagee spoke at the opening of the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, to cheers from the Israeli government.

Zionism has never been shy about alliances with extreme right, antisemitic forces. The founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzel, met with the Interior Minister of Tsarist Russia, the murderous antisemite Vyacheslav von Plehve, to speak about how to convince Jews to leave Russia. The Nazi government of Germany even signed the Haavara agreement with the Zionists in order to help Jews leave the country, while breaking the international boycott of fascist Germany.

Attacking the Left

So the IHRA definition is employed by the (antisemitic) right in order to attack the Left. This happened with Jeremy Corbyn, a left reformist who was surprisingly elected leader of the Labour Party in the UK. Corbyn was no radical, but he was extremely popular with the youth. His record of opposition to NATO and to imperialist wars, and also to the occupation of Palestine, meant that he was unacceptable for the British ruling class as a possible prime minister.

One of the main tools they used to fight Corbyn was the accusation of antisemitism. And there is a certain irony to the fact that Britain’s tabloids, with their long histories of hating Jewish people and even supporting Hitler, called this mild-mannered social democrat an antisemite. The Labour Party was forced to adopt the IHRA definition, and on that basis, to expel anyone who expressed any kind of opposition to Israel. The people expelled included the Black Jewish antiracist activist Jackie Walker and even the Israeli-British socialist Moshé Machover

It is not not unusual for extreme right gentiles to accuse Jews of antisemitism. The most absurd example was the Trump adviser Sebastian Gorka, who appeared on TV on the night of Trump’s election wearing a symbol of Hungarian fascists. Gorka accused a liberal Jewish critic of antisemitism!

Our History

These false accusations of antisemitism against the Left cannot in any way hide the fact that racist hatred against Jews still exists. Recent years have seen an increase on attacks against Jewish people and institutions to the growth of white supremacist groups in the United States that use Nazi symbols to invoke their supposed racial purity. We will fight against these expressions of racist hatred relentlessly, as we always have and always will. 

The socialist Left has a long history of fighting antisemitism. August Bebel famously referred to antisemitism as the “socialism of fools.” Jewish people have always played such an important role in the socialist movement because socialism promised complete equality for everyone, and a dissolution of rigid national and ethnic groups into a universal human culture.

At the same time, the socialist Left has always opposed Zionism. Among the Jewish workers of Europe, Zionism was a minority current. Revolutionary Jewish workers opposed the reactionary utopia of a new Jewish state in Palestine — they preferred to fight where they were, alongside workers of all other nationalities, for their common liberation. 

The fact that socialists, who were once accused of representing a Jewish conspiracy, are now being accused of antisemitism, is probably one of the most bizarre phenomena of capitalism in decay. But socialists will continue to fight for the program we have always defended: against all forms of racism, and also against imperialism and colonialism, for the self-determination of all oppressed people, including the Palestinians.

We fight for a socialist revolution in the Middle East. We demand the right of return for all Palestinian refugees and the dismantling of the Israeli state as a pro-imperialist and colonial enclave. Our goal is a socialist Palestine with full democratic rights for all people who want to live there. A democratically planned economy would make it possible to break from imperialism and create equal living conditions for everyone.

Facebook Twitter Share

Nathaniel Flakin

Nathaniel is a freelance journalist and historian from Berlin. He is on the editorial board of Left Voice and our German sister site Klasse Gegen Klasse. Nathaniel, also known by the nickname Wladek, has written a biography of Martin Monath, a Trotskyist resistance fighter in France during World War II, which has appeared in German, in English, and in French. He is on the autism spectrum.


Ideas & Debates

Neither NATO Nor Putin: An Anti-war Program for an Anti-war Protest

The following is a flier that Left Voice distributed at the March 18 rally in DC with the anti-war program we believe we must all take up.

Left Voice

March 19, 2023

Understanding the Global Context of the Ukrainian Conflict: A Response to Our Critics

The 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the massive rearmament of Europe that followed mark a new stage in a growing conflict that has become a proxy war between the imperialist states of the US and NATO on one side, and an emerging alliance between Russia and China on the other. While some on the Left see this new pole of Russia and China as a check against US imperialism, neither country is anti-imperialist, and neither has anything progressive to offer working people.

Jimena Vergara

March 16, 2023

Pro-NATO Positions Split a Trotskyist Tendency

The war in Ukraine has led to intense debates on the international socialist Left. In November, the Socialist Labor Party (SEP) of Turkey announced it was breaking with the Socialist Workers Movement (MST) of Argentina, in a serious blow to their common project, the International Socialist League (ISL-LIS). What can we learn from this split?

Nathaniel Flakin

March 10, 2023

Dossier: One Year of a Reactionary War in Ukraine

With the aim of developing an international perspective for working class intervention against the reactionary war in Ukraine, we publish this dossier. These articles engage with some of the key debates the war has opened on the Left, analysis on how the geopolitical crisis is developing, and the positions of our international tendency: the Trotskyist Fraction - Fourth International.

Left Voice

March 5, 2023


“We Deserve a Living Wage:” on the Limits of the New Temple Grad Worker Contract 

A graduate worker at Temple reflects on the limits and strengths of the new contract won in the recent strike.

Femicide: The Face of a Patriarchal Capitalist Society

On March 8, the feminist movement flooded the streets of Mexico as part of a global day of mobilization. Among these thousands of women and dissidents, the main demand was an end to femicide and sexist violence.

Yara Villaseñor

March 31, 2023

Biden’s Proposed Budget Nothing but Empty Promises 

Earlier this month, Joe Biden announced his budget proposal, with a lot of promises. But the only thing we know he’ll deliver is that “nothing will fundamentally change.”

Molly Rosenzweig

March 31, 2023

At Least 39 Migrants Die in Fire at Detention Center in Mexico. The State Is Responsible.

The events of March 27 marked one of the darkest chapters in the Mexican State’s anti-immigrant policy, a policy that is increasingly subordinated to the interests of U.S. imperialism.