Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Climate Summits Won’t Save Us: We Need to Protest COP26

For the past three decades a select group of world leaders, scientists and environmental NGOs have regularly met at such international gatherings. Yet despite all the discussions global emissions have continued their relentless rise.

Xavier Dupé

October 7, 2021
Facebook Twitter Share
Activists protesting outside IFEMA, where UN Climate Change Conference COP25 is being held on Dec. 13, 2019.
Photo: Marcos del Mazo/ Getty Images

Originally Published in Red Flag

*

What might Greta Thunberg say about the upcoming United Nations Conference of the Parties (COP26) summit being held in Glasgow from 31 October to 12 November? Probably—if the recent speech she gave at the UN Youth4Climate conference in Italy is anything to go by—it would be something like: “blah, blah, blah”. “They’ve now had 30 years”, she said, “of blah, blah, blah. And where has that led us? Over 50 percent of all our CO2 emissions have occurred since 1990, and a third since 2005.”

For the past three decades a select group of world leaders, scientists and environmental NGOs have regularly met at such international gatherings. Yet despite all the discussions global emissions have continued their relentless rise.

The history of UN climate conferences isn’t really one of failure. These summits were always as much about greenwashing the status-quo as anything else—providing a way for the people who created the climate crisis to present themselves as being part of the solution. In this, unfortunately, they’ve been very successful. Political leaders have learnt how far a bit of green-sounding rhetoric will go. And they know they can rely on the mainstream media to faithfully report, as Thunberg noted in her speech, “on what leaders say they’re going to do, instead of what they’re actually doing”.

The annual Conference of the Parties was started in 1992 under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The main achievements of these UN sponsored climate talks have been the Kyoto Protocol, which was adopted in 1997 and went into force in 2005, and the 2015 Paris Agreement. The goals of the Kyoto Protocol were modest, to say the least. For many developed countries, it didn’t require any emissions cuts at all until at least 2013, and the world’s biggest emitter at the time, the United States, never ratified it.

The Paris Agreement looks more impressive on paper. It set the goal of limiting global heating to 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius, and to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. But it allowed countries to set their own targets, with the predictable results. Australia’s 2030 target, for instance, is a 26-28 percent reduction in emissions from 2005 levels. And that’s taking into account the highly dubious use of “land use change” (which measures emissions from changes in the rate of deforestation, as well as reforestation where that occurs), which accounts for almost all of the Australian government’s claimed emissions reductions since 2005.

The Agreement hasn’t yet resulted in any actual drop in global emissions. Between 2005 and 2019, global carbon emissions increased from 29.42 billion tonnes to 36.45 billion tonnes, a rise of 24 percent. And according to the UN’s own forecast, based on existing commitments made under the Agreement, global emissions will still be 16 percent above 2010 levels by 2030. To have a good chance of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees, scientists think, we need a cut of at least 45 percent in global emissions by then. Our current trajectory puts us on course for a much greater temperature rise.

It was clear from the start that the Paris Agreement wouldn’t live up to the initial hype. In place of the kind of radical, transformative change we need to avoid climate catastrophe the commitments made under the Agreement merely provide the appearance of action. COP26 will, according to the summit website, “bring parties together to accelerate action towards the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change”. But this isn’t anything much to boast about when the goals themselves are so utterly inadequate to the task at hand.

It’s futile to place our hopes in yet more international talk-shops like we’re going to see at COP26 in Glasgow. As Thunberg suggests, instead of focusing on the green rhetoric and long-term targets, we should be focusing on what global leaders are doing in the here and now. On that level, it’s clear: not only are major global emitters like the US and Australia failing to meet their obligations, they’re not even trying.

The Australian government has its sights set on the indefinite prolongation of the country’s current coal and gas boom. A recent study in Nature found 95 percent of Australia’s coal reserves must remain in the ground if we’re to meet our obligations under the Paris Agreement. Yet everything the government is doing points in the other direction—from its determined support for the opening-up of the giant Galilee Basin coal reserves in northern Queensland, to its recent approval of three new coal projects in the space of a month.

It’s possible that international pressure will lead, at some point, to Scott Morrison adopting the (effectively meaningless) target of “net zero by 2050”. But that won’t change the facts on the ground. And the same is true of US President Joe Biden. Much has been made of his supposed green credentials. But in practice since his election it has been business as usual for the US fossil fuel industry.

If we allow ourselves to be sucked-in by the media hype surrounding COP26, then we’re inviting another decade, or more, of inaction. Instead, we need to protest. As Thunberg put it, “We can no longer let the people in power decide what is politically possible or not. We can no longer let the people in power decide what hope is. Hope is not passive. Hope is not blah, blah, blah. Hope is telling the truth. Hope is taking action. And hope always comes from the people.”

In Australia we will have a chance to generate some of that hope for ourselves, when we join others around the world in taking to the streets on Saturday 6 November for a global day of action for climate justice. The protests here are being organised by Uni Students for Climate Justice. I urge you to join us, because no one is coming to save us except us.

Facebook Twitter Share

Guest Posts

Protesters at the University of Michigan holding Palestine flags and a big banner that reads "DIVEST."

University of Michigan Faculty Senate Approves Divestment Resolution

The University of Michigan Faculty Senate recently passed a measure calling for divestment from companies investing in Israel's attacks on Gaza. Will the university’s capitalist bosses change course and support democratic demands to stop funding genocide?

Ryan McCarty

February 4, 2024

If Palestinian Lives Matter, the UAW Should Not Endorse Biden

The UAW bureaucracy is meeting in Washington DC, where they are discussing, among other things, whether to endorse Joe Biden for president. If the UAW cares about its own call for a ceasefire in Gaza, it should refuse to endorse Biden (as well as Trump).

Daniel Werst

January 23, 2024
Scenic sunset over the Mediterranean Sea

Yearning Waves: A Palestinian’s Tale of Dreams and the Stolen Sea

A Palestinian shares his pain and sadness over the hoops he must jump through in order to experience his own land.

Leaders gathering at the Davos 2024 conference.

Davos and the Melting World Economy

The rich elite are meeting in Davos to discuss the challenges facing humanity in 2024, like climate change and AI. But any proposed solutions are driven by the aim to sustain the world capitalist order.

Michael Roberts

January 17, 2024

MOST RECENT

With Rafah in the Crosshairs, the Working Class Can Stop the Genocide in Gaza

As Israel prepares an invasion of Rafah, workers’ organizations around the world must take action before it's too late.

James Dennis Hoff

February 21, 2024

“Antideutsche”: The Aberration of Germany’s Pro-Zionist Left

As Germany persists in its unwavering support of Israel and the total denial of its genocide, the German Left is conflicted over the issue. While leftists all over the world are showing solidarity with Palestine, a segment of the German Left is historically pro-Zionist. How did this movement, the so-called Antideutsche (Anti-Germans) come to be?

Seb Zürcher

February 21, 2024

Why German Media are Lying About the Palestine Solidarity Movement at the Free University of Berlin

A rally in front of the Free University of Berlin had as many journalists as demonstrators. This is yet another example of the international campaign to defame all protests against Israel's genocidal military campaign.

Nathaniel Flakin

February 16, 2024
CUNY workers at a demonstration hold a banner that reads "STRIKE TO SAVE CUNY."

CUNY Workers Launch New Strike Campaign

As Governor Hochul proposes another $528 million in cuts, workers at the City University of New York are fighting back.

Olivia Wood

February 12, 2024