Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

The Ukrainian Counteroffensive: What Happens Next?

The long-awaited Ukrainian counteroffensive seems to be underway, but the chances that it will profoundly change the fate of the war are looking slim. Is this the last step before negotiations begin or simply a continuation of the war?

Philippe Alcoy

June 21, 2023
Facebook Twitter Share
A Ukrainian self-propelled howitzer Caesar is seen, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, near the front line in the newly liberated village Storozheve in Donetsk region, Ukraine June 14, 2023.
Image: Oleksandr Ratushniak/REUTERS

Finally, the Ukrainian spring counteroffensive seems to have arrived. Expectations are high, but the uncertainties are even greater. It is still too early to say with any certainty what the results and consequences will be for the war, or even for the internal situation of the two regimes — especially since the initial results so far seem rather mixed.

Indeed, many analysts believe that the most coherent military objective for Kiev would be to try to break through the Russian defense and succeed in cutting the land link between the Crimean Peninsula, annexed by Russia in 2014, and the Donbass. But despite the weapons, tanks, ammunition, and other modern equipment sent by the imperialist powers of NATO, the advance of Ukrainian forces is proving complicated for the time being. There have been reports of the destruction or abandonment of some of this equipment after failed offensives, including four Leopard 2 tanks and 16 American M2A2 Bradleys. This is partly explained by the differences between defensive and offensive operations; the attacking force is more exposed to attacks by the defending force on its most powerful armor and equipment.

These setbacks make it difficult to assess the Ukrainian government’s true military and political objectives. All the more so as Kiev’s main partners are publicly expressing opinions that seem to run counter to Zelenskyy’s declared aims, namely the recapture of a part of Ukrainian territory still under Russian occupation. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, for example, has declared that he would like to see a victorious counteroffensive that would “push Putin to finally focus on negotiating an end to the war he started.” French president Emmanuel Macron has made similar statements.

The Ukrainian government has repeatedly said it will not negotiate with Russia until the latter’s troops leave Ukrainian territory, including Crimea. So the question stands: What are the real objectives of this counteroffensive? Is Zelenskyy trying to use this operation to pressure imperialist governments to guarantee Ukraine’s future integration into NATO? Are the imperialist leaders trying to push Zelenskyy to negotiate as soon as the counteroffensive is over?

All this, however, does not mean that Russia is in a position of strength and has overcome its own contradictions on the military and political fronts. Indeed, the gains from its winter offensive have been very limited. The capture of Bakhmut is a meager consolation after the loss of enormous amounts of weaponry and, above all, fighters. These mixed results have led to friction within the military and security apparatus of the Kremlin regime.

For several weeks now, there have been public disputes between the head of the private paramilitary group Wagner, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu. The Wagner Group boss accuses Russian defense officials of boycotting his fighters by not sending ammunition, among other things. The latest dispute concerns the defense minister’s decision to require paramilitary groups fighting in Ukraine to sign an agreement with his ministry, which Prigozhin refuses to do.

Putin, who usually stays on the sidelines of such disputes, seems to be siding with his minister this time. But as the Financial Times reports,

Even as he backed the defence ministry’s move to subordinate the militias, Putin implied that much of Prigozhin’s criticism of the army had been correct — a possible sign Wagner had yet to entirely lose his support.

“At the start of the special military operation, we quickly realized that the ‘carpet generals’ … are not effective, to put it mildly,” Putin said. “People started to come out of the shadows who we hadn’t heard or seen before, and they turned out to be very effective and made themselves useful.”

But if Russia is not in a position of strength, that doesn’t mean it hasn’t learned to take advantage of some of the ground it has conquered. Indeed, Western analysts no longer hesitate to point out that the Russian army has learned from its mistakes at the outset of the war. Moreover, they “denounce” Western leaders for failing to appreciate this new reality and continuing to believe that Ukraine can dominate the military terrain.

As military analyst and former U.S. Army colonel Daniel L. Davis writes,

As of November 2022, it was fair to say the Russian general staff had been outperformed by the Ukrainian general staff. Many pundits in the West concluded that Russian troops and leaders were deeply flawed and incapable of improving, believing that Russia would remain incapable tactically for the duration of the war.

What many of these analysts failed to recognize, however, is that Russia has vastly more capacity to make war, both in terms of material and personnel, and therefore has the capacity to absorb enormous losses and still remain viable. Further, Russian history is replete with examples of starting out poorly in wars, suffering large casualties, and then recovering to turn the tide. Ukraine, on the other hand, has significantly fewer resources or troops and therefore has less room for error.

Later, the same analyst sets out a very pessimistic view of Ukraine’s chances of military victory:

Ukraine is now faced with a world-class dilemma: should they use their last offensive capacity in a last gasp of hoping they inflict a grave wound on the Russians defending in the occupied territories or preserve them in case Russia launches a summer offensive of their own? There are serious risks with either course of action. I assess there is currently no likely path for Ukraine to achieve a military victory. Continuing to fight in that hope may perversely result in them losing even more territory.

A defeat in the Ukrainian counteroffensive could have major consequences for Zelenskyy’s government in terms of Western support. It could bolster the positions of those who believe that the time for negotiations has come, and strengthen the political parties who are increasingly expressing reservations about the level of military assistance going to Ukraine. This is especially the case in the United States, which is entering an election year. Both Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, rivals for the Republican Party nomination, have asserted that Ukraine is not among the country’s “vital interests.”

Neither imperialist diplomacy nor continuing the war has even remotely progressive prospects for the working class and oppressed in Ukraine and Russia. On the contrary, in the absence of any revolutionary alternative for the workers, Ukraine (and Russia) is heading for a period of enormous setbacks and attacks on the living conditions of millions of working-class people. This new period could prove even more catastrophic than the post–Cold War era, which saw the restoration of capitalism throughout the region, even if this war is a sort of sequel to that period of capitalist restoration. Once again, avoiding this barbarity falls on the shoulders of the workers, on their ability to organize and adopt a policy of class and revolutionary independence in the face of the reactionary plans of the national bourgeoisies and imperialists.

Originally published in French on June 14 in Révolution Permanente.

Translation by Emma Lee

Facebook Twitter Share

Philippe Alcoy

Philippe is an editor of Révolution Permanente, our sister site in France.



Thousands of Police Deployed to Shut Down Congress on Palestine in Berlin

This weekend, a Palestine Congress was supposed to take place in the German capital. But 2,500 police were mobilized and shut down the event before the first speech could be held. Multiple Jewish comrades were arrested.

Nathaniel Flakin

April 12, 2024

Fired by a German University for Solidarity with Palestine — Interview with Nancy Fraser

The University of Cologne canceled a guest professorship with the philosophy professor from The New School. In this interview, she speaks about Germany dividing between "Good Jews" and "Bad Jews," her politicization in the civil rights movement, and her time in an Israeli kibbutz.

Nathaniel Flakin

April 10, 2024

Pro-Palestine Activists in France Get Summons from Anti-Terrorist Police

As part of a repressive campaign against the movement for Palestine in France activists have gotten summons from “anti-terrorist” police. The movement for Palestine in the United States must oppose all repression of our movement here and in Europe.

Samuel Karlin

April 9, 2024

Berlin’s Mayor Loves Antisemites

Kai Wegner denounces the “antisemitism” of left-wing Jews — while he embraces the most high-profile antisemitic conspiracy theorist in the world.

Nathaniel Flakin

March 22, 2024


Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Has No Place at Labor Notes

The Labor Notes Conference will have record attendance this year, but it’s showing its limits by opening with a speech from Chicago’s pro-cop Democratic mayor, Brandon Johnson. Instead of facilitating the Democratic Party’s co-optation of our movement, Labor Notes should be a space for workers and socialists to gather and fight for a class-independent alternative.

Emma Lee

April 16, 2024

U.S. Imperialism is Pushing Tensions in the Middle East to a Boiling Point

U.S. Imperialism's support for Israel is driving the tensions behind Iran's attack and the escalations in the Middle East. It is all the more urgent for the working class to unite with the movement for Palestine against imperialism and chart a way out of the crisis in the region.

Samuel Karlin

April 15, 2024

Liberal Towns in New Jersey Are Increasing Attacks on Pro-Palestine Activists

A group of neighbors in South Orange and Maplewood have become a reference point for pro-Palestine organizing in New Jersey suburbs. Now these liberal towns are upping repression against the local activists.

Samuel Karlin

April 12, 2024

“We Shouldn’t Let this Stop Us”: Suspended Columbia Student Activist Speaks Out

Aidan Parisi, a student at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, was recently suspended and has been threatened with eviction from their graduate student housing for pro-Palestinian activism on campus. Aidan talked to Left Voice about the state of repression, the movement at Columbia, and the path forward for uniting the student movement with the labor movement and other movements against oppression.

Left Voice

April 11, 2024