Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

University of Michigan Proposes a Harsh Policy Curtailing Freedom of Speech and Protest on Campus

A new policy proposal targeting activists, protestors, and union organizers is cause for concern, but might help groups engaged in a range of struggles find a common enemy.

Ryan McCarty

March 30, 2024
Facebook Twitter Share
A group of protesters gather in front of the University of Michigan. Some are holding Palestinian flags
photo cred: Grad Employees’ Org UMich @geo3550

Leaders of the University of Michigan have submitted a draft proposal to the community, laying out a policy of extreme repression against protests of all kinds. The policy “applies to all students, employees, contractors, volunteers, and visitors” and defines a very broad range of prohibited activities:

No Person may disrupt the University Operations of UM Facilities, including but not limited to the communications or activities of speakers or performers on University Facilities, or of any class, laboratory, seminar, examination, performance, formal proceeding, activity in a reserved space, field trip, or other educational, research, artistic, athletic, medical, operational, or service activity occurring on UM Facilities by obstructing lines of sight, making loud or amplified noises, projecting light or images, or otherwise creating substantive distractions.

This kind of language could reasonably apply to nearly any speech on campus, including peaceful marches, dissent in classrooms, union activities, and protests against invited speakers (like white nationalist Richard Spencer, whose planned visit in 2017 was eventually canceled because of continuous pressure from students, faculty, and the broader community). These activities are all essential to a free and open university and for a democratic community. When the university administration labels them all as “disruption” in blanket terms, they clearly stake themselves against freedom of speech and intellectual engagement. 

Just as troubling is their broad proposed ability to punish anyone the university deems disruptive:

If the University has good cause to believe that a Person has violated this Policy, the University may take immediate action to prevent ongoing and further disruption and hold the Person accountable to the full extent of its authority under existing laws, ordinances, and University rules—including requests for misdemeanor charges

Enforcement of the policy is based solely on the university administration’s discretion, allowing them to respond as they see fit. This statement should be taken as a very lightly-veiled threat of police violence, especially given the recent examples of heavy repression of activists on campus. Following a picket during a graduate student strike last year, campus police followed two graduate students off campus and attempted to arrest them before community members demanded their release. In November, a protest demanding that the university divest from companies profiting from the genocide in Gaza ended with more than 40 arrests and citations, as huge numbers of police units from across the county convened on campus to aid in the repression.  Given their very brazen willingness to use police violence, the university’s proposal should be especially troubling for anyone wary of these kinds of anti-free speech repression. 

It is especially ironic (though not surprising) that the university administration is framing this repressive statement as a measure designed to protect freedom of speech and expression. The proposed language states that: “No one has the right to infringe on the exercise of others’ speech and activities by disrupting the normal celebrations, activities, and operations of the University.” 

The proposed policy was drafted, the university claims, as a response to a pro-Palestinian protest at a university honors event on March 24th, but the administration has been publishing statements laying the groundwork for a more authoritarian approach to campus protests for several months, including a statement on “Principles of Freedom of Thought and Diversity of Opinion” which was approved by the Board of Regents in January. This statement contains similar language limiting the free expression of speech and states that the university has the right to “regulate the time, place, and manner of expression.” The university also unilaterally canceled two student government referendum votes in November, one condemning the use of police violence against protestors and another calling for divestment from companies profiting from Israel’s occupation of Gaza. 

The draft statement was submitted to the university community for comments. The survey is open until April 3. However, the message sent to the community was unclear about how such results would be used or if the results would be made public. 

This authoritarian move by the University of Michigan administration comes amid a wave of crackdowns on free speech across the country. Universities have cited right-wing pressures in government as a motivation for such repression, arguing that they are acting out of an excess of caution. The University of Michigan’s decision to fight against freedom of speech and protest gives the lie to those sorts of arguments, since the state of Michigan has left universities to determine their own responses to student protests and hasn’t exerted significant pressure to increase such crackdowns. 

So there is no reason to believe that the administration is acting reluctantly as it tries to enact these restrictive policies against the community. It is especially significant to note that these proposed policies are clearly targeting pro-Palestinian protestors and union workers and anti-police activists. While this should be particularly alarming for advocates of freedom and democracy, it also presents a distinct opportunity. When a broad range of workers and activists are targeted together, it illustrates the shared nature of our struggles. It is time for these constituencies to come together and start to exercise their shared power to resist not only this particular policy limiting freedom of speech and protest on campus, but the broader idea that leaders have the power to determine how our universities and communities run.  

Facebook Twitter Share

Guest Posts

Xenophobia on the Rise in Russia  

After the deadly attack on a music hall in Moscow, racism against non-Russian people is growing. This has a long history in Russia. 

Alina Tatarova

April 5, 2024

Lord Balfour Was an Imperialist Warmonger 

We should give our full solidarity to the Palestine Action comrade who defaced a portrait of Arthur Balfour at Cambridge University. But the problem for everyone who opposes the genocide against Gaza is how to massify and politically equip the movement.

Daniel Nath

March 21, 2024

“Poor Things” Floats Like a Butterfly and Stings Like a Butterfly

Poor Things is a fantastical comedy with beautiful set design and costumes and an Oscar-winning performance from Emma Stone. So why did it leave me feeling so empty? Despite juggling feminist and socialist ideas, the film is ideologically muddled and often self-contradictory.

Basil Rozlaban

March 16, 2024

The CUNY PSC Must Organize for Palestine

CUNY workers and students are rising up to defend their university against cuts, and to fight for the liberation of Palestine.

Lucien Baskin

March 8, 2024


Thousands of Police Deployed to Shut Down Congress on Palestine in Berlin

This weekend, a Palestine Congress was supposed to take place in the German capital. But 2,500 police were mobilized and shut down the event before the first speech could be held. Multiple Jewish comrades were arrested.

Nathaniel Flakin

April 12, 2024

Liberal Towns in New Jersey Are Increasing Attacks on Pro-Palestine Activists

A group of neighbors in South Orange and Maplewood have become a reference point for pro-Palestine organizing in New Jersey suburbs. Now these liberal towns are upping repression against the local activists.

Samuel Karlin

April 12, 2024

“We Shouldn’t Let this Stop Us”: Suspended Columbia Student Activist Speaks Out

Aidan Parisi, a student at Columbia University’s School of Social Work, was recently suspended and has been threatened with eviction from their graduate student housing for pro-Palestinian activism on campus. Aidan talked to Left Voice about the state of repression, the movement at Columbia, and the path forward for uniting the student movement with the labor movement and other movements against oppression.

Left Voice

April 11, 2024

Fired by a German University for Solidarity with Palestine — Interview with Nancy Fraser

The University of Cologne canceled a guest professorship with the philosophy professor from The New School. In this interview, she speaks about Germany dividing between "Good Jews" and "Bad Jews," her politicization in the civil rights movement, and her time in an Israeli kibbutz.

Nathaniel Flakin

April 10, 2024