Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Capitalist Governments Say: Shelter in Place — and Go to Work!

In many European countries, the police can fine or arrest you for meeting with friends in a park. But we are still expected to spend eight hours in an office with tens or hundreds of other people. Governments in Germany, France, Italy, Australia, and to some degree, the U.S. are all practicing this seemingly contradictory policy. They are defending capitalist profits, not people’s lives.

Nathaniel Flakin

March 25, 2020
Facebook Twitter Share

Since Sunday, Germany has been on lockdown. The federal and state governments prohibited gatherings of more than two people. In Berlin, where I am writing this, people are required to carry government-issued identification including their address at all times.

We are still allowed to go to the supermarket or the pharmacy, or take a walk, but other than that we are supposed to stay at home. All schools have been closed since March 17. Bars were all shut down three days before that. These are drastic but important measures to slow the spread of the coronavirus.  Social distancing is necessary to stop the spread. 

There is one huge exception, however: People are still allowed and expected to go to work. While many people are working from home, countless others are still commuting to an office or a factory, which is why buses and subways are still running. This includes essential workers, such as healthcare or supermarket workers, but it also includes thousands who are being forced to come into the office and do not know why.

This policy appears completely irrational. The police can fine or even arrest three people sitting together in a park because they could spread the virus. So how can it be acceptable for tens or hundreds of people to sit together in an enclosed space for eight hours working for corporate profits, not to fight the pandemic? Are the German authorities working on the assumption that the virus will only infect people in their free time? But Germany’s absurd policy is no exception. Many countries are responding to the crisis with similarly contradictory and ineffective decrees.

Contradictory and Ineffective

France has similar policies, but is enforcing them with the iron fist of a police state. People can only leave their home for only one hour per day, staying within one kilometer of their address. They need to print out a certificate describing what they are doing. Police are everywhere, and they might even check a person’s groceries to see if they consider the shopping “essential.” Police fined over 4,000 people on the first day of the lockdown —  135 euros a pop. President Emmanuel Macron built up this repressive apparatus to fight the Yellow Vests rebellion. Despite these harsh rules, however, French workers are still being sent to work. Airbus, for example, keeps producing airplanes — taking masks for the factory floor that are desperately needed in hospitals.

Italy went on lockdown on March 9. But it wasn’t until March 21 that the government of Prime Minister Giuseppe Comte declared the closure of all nonessential businesses. So for two weeks, the entire country was told to stay at home and practice social distancing — and simultaneously to go to work! But even the decree that now supposedly stops production is a joke. The government, responding to the pressure of the capitalists’ association Confindustria, has declared whole sectors of industry “essential” even though they are not producing materials to help with the crisis, including plastic, coal, chemistry, and rubber. Even call centers, where workers are pressed together in cubicles for hours on end, have been deemed “strategic.” In Italy, there have already been strikes to shut down auto factories and other sectors that no reasonable people would consider “essential” in a pandemic. Today there is a general strike in Italy to shut down all production.

In Australia, the government of Scott Morrison is telling people to stay home unless it’s “absolutely necessary.” But this same government is refusing to close schools nationally, as it is apparently “absolutely necessary” to keep kids in school so their parents can go to work. Many offices and factories remain open.

The United States has no consistent policy, but states like New York and California have gone on lockdown. In the states, the lockdown is much more lax than in Europe and non-essential work continues.  Companies have been trying to declare themselves “essential” and force their employees to come into work despite the health risks. Even Starbucks, a company worth $66 billion, wanted employees to keep making “essential” coffee, while Tesla refused to shut down its “essential” car plant for almost a week. Despite projections that the worst of the pandemic will last well into April, Donald Trump’s plan is to open up all non-essential businesses by Easter.  

Workers’ Control

These policies might sound wildly irrational: capitalist governments want people to socially distance in their free time — but to work together in close quarters on the job. But this corresponds to the logic of capitalism. Governments are ultimately not interested in protecting public health. Their job is to protect the profits of a tiny minority who own the means of production.

So the question is: who can, and who should, decide what is “essential” or not? 

The answer is simple. Workers themselves know whether the risks are necessary for society. Tellingly, most healthcare workers are not only continuing to work, but doing long shifts in dangerous conditions. Workers producing protective gear and disinfectant around the world are also working overtime. 

It is the workers at a Starbucks or an office or a factory who can decide if it is necessary for them to risk spreading the infection in order to save lives. That is why we don’t need capitalist governments making decisions about what production is “essential.” We need workers’ control of production so working people can make these decisions collectively.

Workers at the big U.S. auto plants decided that manufacturing cars was not essential, and shut down their industry with wildcat strikes. But if these same factories started producing ventilators or other necessary equipment, we can be certain that these same workers would show up and equip themselves with the necessary protective gear.

Facebook Twitter Share

Nathaniel Flakin

Nathaniel is a freelance journalist and historian from Berlin. He is on the editorial board of Left Voice and our German sister site Klasse Gegen Klasse. Nathaniel, also known by the nickname Wladek, has written a biography of Martin Monath, a Trotskyist resistance fighter in France during World War II, which has appeared in German, in English, and in French. He is on the autism spectrum.


Ideas & Debates

Neither NATO Nor Putin: An Anti-war Program for an Anti-war Protest

The following is a flier that Left Voice distributed at the March 18 rally in DC with the anti-war program we believe we must all take up.

Left Voice

March 19, 2023

Understanding the Global Context of the Ukrainian Conflict: A Response to Our Critics

The 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the massive rearmament of Europe that followed mark a new stage in a growing conflict that has become a proxy war between the imperialist states of the US and NATO on one side, and an emerging alliance between Russia and China on the other. While some on the Left see this new pole of Russia and China as a check against US imperialism, neither country is anti-imperialist, and neither has anything progressive to offer working people.

Jimena Vergara

March 16, 2023

Pro-NATO Positions Split a Trotskyist Tendency

The war in Ukraine has led to intense debates on the international socialist Left. In November, the Socialist Labor Party (SEP) of Turkey announced it was breaking with the Socialist Workers Movement (MST) of Argentina, in a serious blow to their common project, the International Socialist League (ISL-LIS). What can we learn from this split?

Nathaniel Flakin

March 10, 2023

Dossier: One Year of a Reactionary War in Ukraine

With the aim of developing an international perspective for working class intervention against the reactionary war in Ukraine, we publish this dossier. These articles engage with some of the key debates the war has opened on the Left, analysis on how the geopolitical crisis is developing, and the positions of our international tendency: the Trotskyist Fraction - Fourth International.

Left Voice

March 5, 2023


Biden’s Proposed Budget Nothing but Empty Promises 

Earlier this month, Joe Biden announced his budget proposal, with a lot of promises. But the only thing we know he’ll deliver is that “nothing will fundamentally change.”

Molly Rosenzweig

March 31, 2023

At Least 39 Migrants Die in Fire at Detention Center in Mexico. The State Is Responsible.

The events of March 27 marked one of the darkest chapters in the Mexican State’s anti-immigrant policy, a policy that is increasingly subordinated to the interests of U.S. imperialism.

The French Union Bureaucracy Walks Back Demand for Complete Withdrawal of Pension Reform

After calling to put the pension reform “on hold,” the Inter-Union has requested “mediation,” even though the French government has rejected outright the proposal, showing that compromise is impossible. This proposition symbolizes the Inter-Union’s strategy of defeat. We urgently need to organize the rank and file to broaden our demands and generalize the strike.

Damien Bernard

March 30, 2023

“Lesser Evil” Biden Wants More Border Patrol Than MAGA Republicans

Over the weekend, Biden bragged about his support for even more resources than “MAGA Republicans.” to “secure the border” on Twitter. This is “lesser evilism” in action.

Molly Rosenzweig

March 28, 2023