Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube

Hutchison Ports Dispute Ends With Dozens of Voluntary Redundancies

The dispute that began on the night of August 6, 2015, when Hutchison Ports Australia (HPA) sacked 97 dockworkers (“wharfies”) by text message and email, has come to an end. So what was the end result of the dispute that some described as ‘the biggest confrontation on the Australian waterfront since the 1998 Patrick lock-out’?

Sean Robertson

January 27, 2016
Facebook Twitter Share

Photo: Hutchison Ports – Stop Union Busting

The community assemblies outside the Hutchison terminals in Sydney and Brisbane have gone and the long-standing tents, union banners and flags are now packed away. Many of the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) members who were sacked back in August have since returned to work.

Beginning in late August, a round of conciliation meetings took place at the Fair Work Commission (FWC) between Hutchison Ports and the MUA. After months of discussions, a negotiated settlement was finally reached last November. This settlement was ratified on November 16 when MUA members at HPA voted by a margin of 147 to 1 to terminate their current (2013) agreement and vote for a new agreement.

Importantly, the negotiated settlement sees no forced redundancies. Given that Hutchison originally sacked 97 of its 224 strong workforce, this is no small achievement. However, part of the settlement was the offer of an “Enhanced Voluntary Redundancy Arrangement” (EVRA) to all 224 workers at HPA. The 64 dockworkers, 36 from Sydney and a further 36 from Brisbane, that accepted this package received a payout of 26 weeks’ pay at their base wage. According to the November 16 Australian Financial Review, this equates to a payment of up to $20,000 over and above their standard redundancy entitlements.

These 64 wharfies will also be placed on a two-year waiting list for the option of returning to Hutchison as casual employees if shipping volumes increase. With industry volumes projected to grow at only 2 to 3 percent a year, shipping at Hutchison will only rise significantly if it wins contracts from the DP World and Patrick/Asciano duopoly. All up, Hutchison Ports has achieved a considerable reduction in the size of its workforce that, while more expensive and smaller than originally planned, is still significant nevertheless.

The new Enterprise Agreement (EA) voted for on November 16 sees a move from the 30-hour roster to a 32-hour week. The amended provisions for a future “Phase 2” of operations will not only see a shift to a 32-hour week roster reducing overtime costs, but will also replace the previous clearly-defined roster with a more flexible indicative-style roster. This will cause actual shift patterns to become more dependent on shipping schedules. While a roster based on a 32-hour week is better than the 35-hour week industry standard, the move away from a 30-hour week and the removal of clearly-defined work rosters are steps in the wrong direction for maritime workers.

The new agreement also provides for casual employment at Hutchison Ports for the first time. The original 2013 agreement provided only for full-time employment based on a 30-hour week with a flexible indicative-style roster. Senior HPA management described the new category of flexible casual employees as providing the company with “greatly enhanced flexibility”.

The 2015 EA also includes new safety clauses, which some MUA representatives have called “the best safety clauses in the industry”. However, a close reading of these clauses suggests that they are little more than the repetition of rights and responsibilities already available to dock workers under current health and safety legislation.

The negotiations have also seen the Maritime Union pull the plug on its Federal Court action that it lodged against Hutchison last August. As reported previously in Left Voice, a judge ruled on August 14 that there was enough “prima facie” evidence to suggest that Hutchison had contravened the Fair Work Act when it sacked 97 dock workers, making the company potentially liable for multi-million dollar fines. On October 8, the two parties reached an in principle agreement that the MUA’s Federal Court proceedings against HPA would be discontinued with “each party bearing their own costs”.

While the company has been handed a “Get out of Jail Free” card, the MUA has not been so lucky. The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has launched an investigation into the “community assembly” protests that stopped all trucks from entering and exiting the terminals during the first week of the dispute. These initial protests were in clear defiance of two Fair Work Commission return to work orders handed out on August 7 and 10. In late September, the MUA began warning its members about FWO attempts to contact union members about these protests. The Fair Work Ombudsman has the power to hit the MUA with multi-million dollar fines, which could then open the way for legal claims for damages against the union.

Both sides have claimed victory in this dispute. According to senior Hutchison management, the negotiated outcome will help the company to “manage its significant costs in a difficult environment” and assist it “in its struggle to achieve market share against well-established competitors in a market plagued with overcapacity and slow growth”. MUA representatives described the settlement as a “major victory for the MUA and all Hutchison workers” and a “wonderful result” which has delivered “justice”.

To move from a position where 97 workers were sacked in August to a negotiated settlement that has not one single forced redundancy is a significant turnaround. But to speak of a “major victory” is another matter. Hutchison Ports now has a significantly reduced workforce, has won a move from a 30-hour to a 32-hour week with more flexible rosters, and now has casual employment for the first time. A continuing Fair Work investigation with its threat of multi-million dollar fines hangs over the head of the MUA. To suggest that the Maritime Union has not sustained losses in this battle is to deny reality. For the MUA, this is not a “major victory” but a defensive, orderly retreat that has avoided a serious defeat.

The 2013 Hutchison Ports Enterprise Agreement can be found here

The new 2015 Hutchison Ports Enterprise Agreement can be found here

Facebook Twitter Share

Asia-Pacific

Participants in a memorial ceremony lay flowers to pay respect to a deceased 23-year-old worker in front of the SPC headquarters in Seoul, Thursday. She died in an accident at a baking factory in Pyeongtaek affiliated with SPC on Saturday.

How Workers and Socialists are Responding to a Workplace Death at One of South Korea’s Largest Food Manufacturers

Following a workplace death at SPC group, one of the largest food manufacturers in South Korea, a consumer boycott quickly gained traction. Organized workers and revolutionary socialists are playing a role in this struggle.

Sam Carliner

November 12, 2022
A man holds a Sri Lankan national flag during a protest outside the Parliament complex in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Protests Against Inflation and the IMF Return to Sri Lanka

Protesters, along with unions and political organizations took to the streets of Sri Lanka on Thursday, mobilizing against inflation, staggering food prices, and new IMF adjustment programs ushered in by the the illegitimate government of Wickremesinghe, which replaced Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government by mass demonstrations in July.

What’s behind the Escalations in Korea?

For the first time in five years, tensions in the Korean peninsula are escalating. This comes in the context of a U.S. military buildup in the Pacific, driven by greater capitalist competition between the United States and China.

Sam Carliner

October 7, 2022
A Pakistani man wades through flood waters carrying a bit bag of produce.

‘It’s Time to Declare War on This Climate-Destroying System!’: Interview with a Pakistani Socialist about the Flood

The flood in Pakistan is one of the most horrific climate events in recent history. A Pakistani socialist describes the consequences of the disaster, as well as the economic crises facing the country.

Maxi Schulz

October 3, 2022

MOST RECENT

Sorry Jacobin, But Crushing Rail Workers’ Right to Strike Is Not Progressive

Jacobin’s Branko Marcetic is applauding progressive Democrats like AOC and Jamaal Bowman for their vote to force rail workers to accept a contract they explicitly rejected on terms that are not even close to their original demands.

James Dennis Hoff

December 1, 2022

Biden, Congress, and the Squad Just Voted to Block a Rail Strike. Workers Should be the Ones Who Decide

The Biden administration called on Congress to undemocratically impose a contract on rail workers across the country and avert a nationwide rail strike. The deal has already passed the House with unanimous support from Democrats. This latest maneuver by a “proud pro-labor President” shows that there is no such thing: the state acts in favor of the bosses to protect their profits.

Madeleine Freeman

November 30, 2022

“Grueling Working Conditions and Low Wages”: A Testimonial from a UPS Warehouse Worker

Workers in UPS warehouses are among the most precarious workers in the logistics industry. As the 2023 Teamsters contract negotiations approaches, a UPS warehouse worker speaks out about his working conditions and calls for unity in struggle among UPS drivers and warehouse workers.

Nehuen Latif

November 30, 2022
The U.S. Congress building

Senate Votes to Overturn Covid-19 National Emergency

Just over a week after the “election to save democracy,” Senate Democrats voted with Republicans to end the Covid-19 Emergency Declaration three years after it was invoked. Both parties show us time and time again that the working class needs its own party.

Mike Pappas

November 29, 2022